Breath Testing Instruments

Breath Test Devices

Evidential Breath Testing. An individual suspected of DUI is often required to submit to evidential breath testing administered by law enforcement officers. Evidential breath testing devices produce printouts that are generally admissible as evidence in a court of law. Evidential Breath Testing devices on the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration’s conforming products list (CPL) are the only devices which may be used to conduct alcohol confirmation tests under 49 CFR Part 40.

At a minimum, NHTSA requires that all evidential breath test instruments:

  • Provides a printed triplicate result (or three consecutive identical copies of a result) of each breath test;
  • Assigns a unique number to each completed test, which the BAT and employee can read before each test and which is printed on each copy of the result;
  • Prints, on each copy of the result, the manufacturer's name for the device, its serial number, and the time of the test;
  • Distinguishes alcohol from acetone at the 0.02 alcohol concentration level;
  • Tests an air blank; and
  • Performs an external calibration check.

There are a multitude of instruments currently in use throughout the United States. Some states even employ multiple instruments depending on jurisdiction. While the science behind these instruments is generally the same, each machine has unique functions, capabilities and limitations.

Below you will find pages dedicated to some of the most common instruments currently being used by law enforcement nationwide. For more information about specific breath test instruments currently in use, contact a State Delegate today or visit our Virtual Forensic Library.

Find an Attorney

Enter your city, state, or Zip code below to locate a qualified attorney who has demonstrated a commitment to defend those accused of DUI and related crimes.

FIND AN ATTORNEYSearch

Members in the SpotlightMembers in
the Spotlight

02/19/2025

J. Christopher Llinas

J. Christopher Llinas: The NCDD member of the spotlight is J. Christopher Llinas of Portland, Connecticut. He is licensed to practice in Connecticut, US D. Conn, US 1st Circuit, US 2nd Circuit, EOIR (Immigration Courts and Board of Immigration Appeals) and Maryland (inactive). He’s been practicing law for 27 years. He is a fierce defender in criminal, DUI, traffic, juvenile and...

Members in the SpotlightLatest from
Our Blog

02/12/2025

Introduction of Autonomous Vehicles and SAE Levels of Driving Automation

By By Lance Hendron An autonomous vehicle, in other words is self-driving car, is a car that is capable of operating with reduced or no human input.1 In 2014, the Society of Automotive...

FROM OUR BLOG

Introduction of Autonomous Vehicles and SAE Levels of Driving Automation

02/12/2025

By By Lance Hendron An autonomous vehicle, in other words is self-driving car, is a car that is capable of operating with reduced or no human input.1 In 2014, the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), launched SAE J3016 Recommended Practice: Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles, commonly referenced as the SAE Levels of...

Forensic Evidence – it has its limits and sometimes those limits are your weapon

01/30/2025

By By Michael J. Nichols This is a story about Karolyn. Karolyn is a 28-year-old Marine Corps veteran. Karolyn was medically discharged from the "Corps" at 20 years old because a 500-pound bomb fell on her during a training exercise. It did not denotate, but it hurt. It literally concussed her entire body. Fast forward by about 4 years. A number changes...

Back to Top